phobos 2 incident debunked
Normally this routine would be removed before launch. (Source: collective-evolution.com; August 21, 2018; released multiple videos of their own through to the stars academy. Commonly called the shadow, whatever caused this has never been determined. heat they radiate, and not by the play of light and shadow on them. has itself always been considered a rather mysterious object, as has
These cookies do not store any personal information. In addition, the Fobos-Grunt mission, also designed to explore Phobos, ended in failure in 2011. it was taken as the spacecraft was aligning itself with Phobos (the
russianspaceweb has the most authoritative writeup I found, but it lists no conclusion as to the failure. (392) One
Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. In the October 19, 1989 issue of Nature Magazine, Soviet scientists It is highly unlikely that a natural
On March 27 the probe maneuvered to image the moon Phobos, breaking the comm link to Earth, and sadly, communications were never re-established. Use MathJax to format equations. Phobos 2 operated nominally throughout its cruise and Mars orbital insertion phases on January 29, 1989, gathering data on the Sun, the interplanetary medium, Mars, and Phobos. And so we see that it is not only NASA that is apparently involved
Because of time pressure from the impending launch, engineers decided to leave the command sequence in, though it should never be used. indentations with radial arms protruding from a central hub" caused
3). [1] equipment that included two packages of instruments to be placed on
underground cavern or channels that are just too geometrically
}
Mars.". When information is presented which goes against the grain no matter how credible the source, even if it goes far beyond simple witness testimony and into hard evidence, its always greeted with a harsh response. "As the last picture was halfway through," he said, "they
Ten Alien Encounters Debunked The Reality of UFO Sightings in 2007 Top 10 Unexplained Phenomena Benjamin Radford has researched mysterious phenomena, including UFO sightings, crop circles and. The site features a collection of unexplained, strange and odd mysteries. Phobos 2 was launched atop a Proton-K with a Blok D upper stage from Baikonur cosmodrome on July 12, 1988, and entered Mars orbit on January 29, 1989. number 39B84). On March 27 the probe maneuvered to image the moon Phobos, breaking the comm link to Earth, and sadly, communications were never re-established. According to Mars, in 1991, the remote viewers issued a report titled Enigma Penetration: Soviet Phobos II Space Craft Images Anomaly. The report outlined how a disc-shaped object arose from the surface of Mars as Phobos neared, all while a second object moved even closer, scanning the probe, and then shooting some sort of, what appeared to be, a particle beam device, which disrupted the communication and guidance equipment. seen by both the optical and the infrared (heat seeking) camera. Remote viewing was part of the US Governments STARGATE program. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Dozens of governments have admitted to the existence of UFOs, theyve released electroopticaldata (radar tracking, video footage), and more. Whats most intriguing about this story is that the photograph drawn by the remote viewers matched the description of the disc above, which is something that was quite common in the remote viewing program. The shadow - spindle- or cigar
Phobos 1 was unfortunately lost en route two months later,
if(screen)
One structure shows the The Probe got close to the surface of Mars, investigating its surface and atmosphere as well as returning approximately 40 images. The last shots Fobos-2 took of the moon Phobos did include a transmission flaw digital artifact as pretty well covered here. April 1989, described the following: "The features are either on the
with the impression that they were merely rocky chunks that bore
[5] One of the computers was completely dead, and the second was starting to malfunction. imaging specialist Vincent DiPietro and a Lockheed computer scientist. The mission's ground control software was using customary units to calculate the spacecraft's momentum, but it was supposed to be using metric units and since the rest of the spacecraft's systems were expecting metric units, MCO ended up flying much too close to Mars and skimming through the red planet's atmosphere. No source is given for the "most likely failure scenario". This is the first photo of Mars taken on the, When this photo was taken, MCO's team had no idea, After taking this photo, Nozomi made two lunar. It was designed to explore the moons of Mars, Phobos, and Demimos. Steven Greer, she
different color cameras as well as cameras taking infrared shots. 1). When viewed over and over again, the pattern
and Tass, the official Soviet news agency, reported that,